Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42424333›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2026

A Tablet Computer-Based Food Record for the Self-Assessment of Nutritional Intake in Patients Undergoing Geriatric Rehabilitation: Prospective Pilot Feasibility Study.

Julia Berndt, Patrick Elfert, Marco Eichelberg, Juergen Martin Bauer, Andreas Hein, Rebecca Diekmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia BerndtAssistance Systems and Medical Device Technology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-3470
Patrick ElfertOFFIS-Institute for Information Technology, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-0702
Marco EichelbergOFFIS-Institute for Information Technology, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8590-3318
Juergen Martin BauerCenter for Geriatric Medicine, Agaplesion Bethanien Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7379-0646
Andreas HeinAssistance Systems and Medical Device Technology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8846-2282
Rebecca DiekmannNutrition and Physical Function in Older Adults, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University, Ammerländer Heerstraße 140, Oldenburg, 26129, Germany, 49 441798 ext 4359.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-3832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nutritional status is an influential factor for functional status and rehabilitation outcomes in patients undergoing geriatric rehabilitation. Although there is evidence for the potential of eHealth interventions in patients undergoing geriatric rehabilitation in general, the evidence for eHealth interventions with a focus on nutrition is scarce. In other target groups with older people, eHealth applications to support nutrition, such as computer-based food records, have been used successfully. Objective: Therefore, the aim of this study was to verify whether it is feasible for patients undergoing geriatric rehabilitation to independently use a tablet computer-based food record (e-food record) to document their food and beverage intake. The e-food record was developed in advance and tailored to the age- and disease-specific needs of patients undergoing geriatric rehabilitation. Methods: This prospective pilot study investigated the general feasibility of an e-food record in older adults (≥70 y) in a geriatric rehabilitation center in Germany. It was tested whether the e-food record could be independently used by the participants over 3 days. Furthermore, the usability of the e-food record was assessed by the System Usability Scale (0-100 points) after usage. To compare nutritional data, the participants recorded their consumption of food and beverages by the e-food record and by a 24-hour recall for the same time period, and the mean difference was calculated as follows: the value of the 24-hour recall minus the value of the e-food record. As the study was characterized as a pilot, the data analysis was descriptive. Results: Seventeen out of 25 patients (n=6, 35.3% female, mean age 79.5, SD 3.7 y) maintained the e-food record independently over the study period. The mean System Usability Scale score of the e-food record was 76.0 (SD 11.3) points. Datasets of 9 out of 17 participants (n=5, 55.6% female, mean age 78.2, SD 2.9 y) were analyzed in terms of nutritional data. Mean differences in energy, protein, and fluid intake by the 24-hour recall compared to the e-food record were 4.9 (SD 10.2) kcal/kg body weight (bw), 0.1 (SD 0.3) g/kg bw, and 4.9 (SD 9.4) g/kg bw, respectively. Conclusions: The use of an e-food record is generally feasible for patients undergoing geriatric rehabilitation characterized by low technical experience, high mean age, and a high rate of functional impairment. Lower intake levels were observed for the e-food record compared to the 24-hour recall with regard to energy, protein, and fluid intake. Aspects for further development of the e-food record were identified to enable evaluation on a larger sample. Following successful evaluation, the e-food record could be used within nutrition therapy in the future to increase the efficiency of the nutritional therapy process.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldDiet RecordsAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentGermanyHumansMaleNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentPilot ProjectsProspective StudieseHealthfeasibility studyfood recordgeriatric rehabilitationnutritionnutrition appolder adultstablet computertechnology

Identifiers

PMID42424333
PMCPMC13348802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.