Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42424321›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Psychometric evaluation of the Urdu version of Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits: A multi-phase validation.

Sania Mazher, Sobia Masood, Takashi Arai

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sania MazherGraduate School of Arts and Letters, Psychology Department, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1411-7328
Sobia MasoodPsychology Department, Rawalpindi Women University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Takashi AraiGraduate School of Arts and Letters, Psychology Department, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Callous-unemotional (CU) traits are central to the specifier with Limited Prosocial Emotions in the DSM-5 and ICD-11, reflecting severe emotional and behavioral disturbances. Despite the global use of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU), no validated version existed in Urdu. The aim of the present study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Urdu version of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU-U) among Pakistani youth. The study consisted of three phases: translation and cultural adaptation of the instrument, assessment of test-retest reliability, and evaluation of structural validity through confirmatory factor analysis, alongside testing of convergent and discriminant validity. Test-retest reliability with bilingual youth (N = 60) was excellent, with the Urdu-Urdu condition demonstrating the highest stability. CFA conducted on a sample of 300 young adults (aged 18-25) supported a refined 12-item two-factor model (Callousness and Uncaring) over the original three-factor and bifactor models, aligning with previous international findings. Internal consistency for both subscales was satisfactory, and the ICU-U demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity through expected associations with criminal sentiments and self-control measures. The findings establish the ICU-U as a culturally relevant and psychometrically sound instrument for identifying CU traits in Urdu-speaking populations. Its use holds promise in clinical, educational, and forensic settings for early detection and intervention planning.

Indexed as

Antisocial Personality DisorderEmotionsPsychometricsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePakistanPersonality InventoryReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42424321
PMCPMC13349191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.