Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42424289›Full record

ArticleRevista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica2026

Adherence to antihypertensive treatment in patients at a tertiary hospital in Lima, Peru.

Angy Aguilar-Lizarme, José Amado-Tineo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angy Aguilar-LizarmeFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
José Amado-TineoFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Peru, there are few reports on pharmacological adherence in patients with arterial hypertension. In this context, the present study aimed to determine adherence to antihypertensive treatment in patients treated at a tertiary-level social security hospital in Lima. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 250 hospitalized patients, over 18 years of age, with a diagnosis of primary arterial hypertension on pharmacological treatment. Adherence was evaluated using the Morisky questionnaire (MMAS-8), and variables such as prescribed medication, age, sex, marital status, and educational level were collected. 56.4% of the participants were male and 86.4% were over 60 years old. It was observed that 42% presented low pharmacological adherence and 58% medium adherence, with no cases of high adherence recorded. Monotherapy was the most frequent regimen (48%), with losartan, nifedipine, and enalapril being the most prescribed drugs. Finally, significant differences were identified between adherence to antihypertensive treatment and educational level and the number of drugs.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsDrug MonitoringHypertensionAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeruTertiary Care CentersAntihypertensive AgentsAntihypertensiveHypertensionTreatment Compliance and Adherence

Identifiers

PMID42424289
PMCPMC13245980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.