ArticlePloS one2026
Machine learning for predicting emergency department visits in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world, multi-institutional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) prone to acute diabetic complications are at high risk for emergency department (ED) visits, which often precede hospitalization and mortality. Identifying these high-risk phenotypes before deterioration is critical for preventative care. We developed machine learning (ML) models using large-scale, real-world electronic medical records, including prescription data, to predict the possibility of ED visits in patients with T2DM and support proactive interventions in primary care settings.
methodsWe analyzed the electronic health record data of five independent institutions, creating a comprehensive dataset of 220,720 patients. The data included dynamic clinical parameters such as vital signs, laboratory results, and prescription histories. The cohort was randomly split into a training set (n = 176,576) and a test set (n = 44,144). The primary outcome was the first ED visit. We developed multiple ML models using an automated ML framework and optimized them using hyperparameter tuning of the training set. Model performances were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, and feature importance was analyzed using SHAP values to ensure interpretability.
resultsAmong the screened population, 49,770 (22.6%) experienced at least one ED visit, distributed proportionally across the training and test datasets. The CatBoost model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.862-0.871) on the test dataset. The model identified modifiable risk factors as key predictors; Diastolic blood pressure was the most significant variable, followed by serum creatinine and systolic blood pressure.
conclusionsThis ML-based predictive model can accurately identify high-risk patients with T2DM who are likely to visit the ED based on readily available clinical variables. By enabling healthcare providers to shift from reactive treatment to proactive risk management, it has the potential to reduce the burden of ED visits due to acute complications in T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.