Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42424269›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Validating a novel driving simulation-based MWT against the standard MWT in an OSA-cohort challenged by CPAP-withdrawal (DS-MWT2) - Protocol for a monocentric, controlled, randomized, crossover trial.

Veronika Gambin, Nan Li, Esther Irene Schwarz, Kristina Keller, Stefan Lakämper

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06872593 (Validating a Novel Driving Simulation-based MWT Against the Standard MWT in an OSA-cohort Challenged by CPAP-withdrawal - a Monocentric, Controlled, Randomized, Crossover Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06872593 narecruitingnot on this map

Validating a Novel Driving Simulation-based MWT Against the Standard MWT in an OSA-cohort Challenged by CPAP-withdrawal - a Monocentric, Controlled, Randomized, Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorStefan LakämperRan2025 to 2027Enrolled54ConditionsExcessive Daytime Sleepiness, Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), CPAP Treatment, Driving Simulator PerformanceArmsCPAP-withdrawal, Test Sequence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Veronika GambinDepartment of Traffic Medicine, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3318-9823
Nan LiDepartment of Traffic Medicine, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7179-0746
Esther Irene SchwarzDepartment of Pulmonology and Sleep Disorders Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8840-981X
Kristina KellerDepartment of Traffic Medicine, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2728-8089
Stefan LakämperDepartment of Traffic Medicine, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7393-7705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a major yet under-recognized contributor to road traffic accidents. Traditional diagnostic tools, such as the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), assess wakefulness under passive conditions but may not accurately reflect real-world driving risks. To address this gap, we have piloted a Driving Simulation-based MWT (DS-MWT), designed to evaluate sleepiness in an ecologically valid driving scenario. The present study aims to validate the novel DS-MWT against the classical MWT in a functionally relevant cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).

methodsThe present monocentric, randomized, controlled, within-subject crossover trial will include 54 participants: 36 patients with OSA undergoing ≥ 7-day CPAP withdrawal (W) or continuation (C), and 18 healthy controls. The study employs a well-established CPAP-withdrawal model in patients with prior optimal treatment adherence to transiently induce EDS under controlled conditions. A healthy control group is included to enable between-group comparisons. The primary expected outcome is the difference in mean latencies between MWT and DS-MWT, determined during four standardized test sessions per condition. Secondary exploratory outcomes are defined as the presence, direction, and magnitude of differences or correlations between treatment status (CPAP withdrawal vs. continuation) and driving performance metrics (e.g., lateral position, speed, lane departures, etc.), EEG and eye-tracking features, subjective sleepiness scores, at-home polysomnography (PSG) parameters, and metabolomic biomarkers (saliva, exhaled breath and dried blood spots). Data will be analyzed using linear mixed models, repeated-measures ANOVA, and predictive modeling with cross-validation. DISCUSSION: This trial addresses a critical limitation in sleep and traffic medicine by introducing a realistic, supposedly more ecologically valid alternative to standard sleepiness assessment tools. The DS-MWT may enhance clinical decision-making regarding fitness to drive (FTD) and provide a framework for identifying physiological and behavioral markers of sleepiness in realistic conditions.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06872593, released on 12.03.2025, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06872593. Swiss National Clinical Trial Portal SNCTP000006301, released on 19.03.2025, https://www.humanforschung-schweiz.ch/en/trial-search/study-detail/66469.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingContinuous Positive Airway PressureSleep Apnea, ObstructiveWakefulnessAccidents, TrafficAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographySleepiness

Identifiers

PMID42424269
PMCPMC13349176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.