ArticlePloS one2026
Interpretable machine learning with Bayesian optimization for bond strength prediction of steel reinforcement in geopolymer concrete.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A CNN Feature Extraction and BKA-Optimized LSSVM Classification Method for Small-Sample Rolling Bearing Fault Diagnosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate estimation of bond strength between steel reinforcement and geopolymer concrete is essential for the reliable design of sustainable reinforced concrete structures. However, the highly nonlinear interactions reduce the applicability and accuracy of conventional empirical models. This study proposes a Bayesian-optimized interpretable machine learning framework to predict the ultimate bond strength of reinforced geopolymer concrete using a comprehensive experimental database compiled from published studies. A dataset of 238 samples with 20 influential input variables was assembled to represent material properties, geopolymer chemistry, and specimen geometry. Six advanced machine learning algorithms, including Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), XGBoost, and CatBoost, were developed and systematically compared. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using Bayesian optimization to improve model performance. The results indicate that all models achieved strong predictive capability, while the optimized CatBoost model (BO-CatBoost) provided the best performance with testing metrics of R² = 0.950, MAE = 1.173, MAPE = 11.608%, and RMSE = 1.669. A comparative evaluation with existing empirical equations further demonstrated the superior accuracy and lower prediction variability of the proposed model. To enhance model transparency, SHAP-based explainability analysis was conducted to quantify the contribution of each input parameter. The global importance analysis revealed that compressive strength, the embedment length-to-bar diameter ratio, and the cover-to-bar diameter ratio are the most influential factors governing bond strength. Additional mixture-related parameters, including the alkaline solution-to-binder ratio, curing temperature, CaO content in the binder, and the SiO₂/Al₂O₃ ratio, also contribute to the bond mechanism by influencing geopolymerization and matrix densification. The proposed framework provides both high predictive accuracy and interpretable insights, demonstrating the potential of Bayesian-optimized interpretable machine learning to support the design and optimization of sustainable reinforced geopolymer concrete structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.