ArticlePloS one2026
Knowledge, attitude, and practices towards rabies: A community survey in selected areas of KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) studies have been widely used to assess gaps in KAP towards rabies. However, there is no evidence of baseline studies that have assessed KAP towards rabies among selected communities in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study design was adopted. Participants (n = 768) were selected using systematic random sampling. Data from respondents (≥18 years of age) were collected using a validated questionnaire and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Overall, 26.95% (207/768) of the respondents could name the cause of rabies, while 53.52% (411/768) indicated that they would adhere to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), which can include, depending on the category of the bite wound, wound washing, and receiving a dose of human rabies immune globulin (HRIG) and rabies vaccine at the time of the first medical visit. Most respondents (90.10%, 692/768) would seek medical attention following a dog bite. Most dog owners (82.11%, 459/559) owned a vaccination certificate for their pet. Allowing dogs to roam without supervision was widely reported by the respondents. Dog ownership was the only factor significantly associated (p = 0.0001) with knowledge of rabies. Gaps in some aspects of knowledge about rabies were observed, which require awareness creation among residents of the study area, irrespective of whether they own pets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.