ArticleFolia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)2026
Erratum.
Article in Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the article by Leppävuori et al. entitled "'Metal' and 'Density' in Phonation according to Complete Vocal Technique: Double-Case Study with Special Reference to Vocal Efficiency and Economy" [Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2026; https://doi.org/10.1159/000550742], some errors were introduced during production:On page 1, the Conclusion section of the Abstract has been changed to read "The examined parameters distinguished between…" instead of "The examined parameters were distinguished between…".On page 4, under the heading "VE and VEC," "Van den and Schutte [20, 21]" has been replaced by "Van den Berg and Schutte [20, 21]".On page 8, under the title "Discussion," the sentence "The trend related to CQ, combined with the strong effect size of GR…" has been changed to read "The trend related to CQ, combined with the strong effect of GR…".On page 15, reference number 20, "Van den BJW," has been updated to "Van den Berg JW".The original article has been updated.
Identifiers
42424236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.