In one paragraphArticle in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
17 authors.
Ryan RobbDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-7661-7902 Sarah E AckermannDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-7361 Seamus E DeganLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-8028-2081 Khalilah E TaylorLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0009-0003-2136-2713 Runying YangLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-5983-9439 Alexander Zuniga MarlerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-8960-0672 Valerie CalvertCenter for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-5075-7728 Mariaelena PierobonCenter for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-2084-1029 Scott LyonsMichael Hooker Proteomics Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3004-0148 Natalie Barker-KrantzMichael Hooker Proteomics Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9248-2710 Aurora CabreraMichael Hooker Proteomics Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0009-0008-1836-2030 Antje SchaeferDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-2716-9899 Laura E HerringMichael Hooker Proteomics Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-4496-7312 Adrienne D CoxDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4901-2454 Emanuel F PetricoinCenter for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0001-8787-5990 Clint A StalneckerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-0570-4416 Kirsten L BryantDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-4026-0942 Funding
Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5MSToP Cancer SPORE: Developmental Research ProgramP50CA257911 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Jen Jen Yeh · 2022 to 2026
$12.9MTargeting undruggable RAS for cancer treatmentR35CA232113 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DER, CHANNING J. · 2018 to 2024
$6.3MCANCER CELL BIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA071341 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHANNING J. DER, Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta · 1996 to 2026
$5.0MUNC Integrated Translational Oncology Program (UNC-iTOP)T32CA244125 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAM Y. KIM, Jen Jen Yeh · 2019 to 2026
$3.9MMechanistic dissection and inhibitor targeting of autophagy in RAS driven cancersR37CA251877 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRYANT, KIRSTEN L · 2020 to 2025
$2.5MMechanistic examination and inhibitor targeting of nutrient scavenging for the treatment of pancreatic cancerF31CA284869 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ryan Robb · 2024 to 2026
$122kNational Cancer Institute (NCI) F31CA284869National Cancer Institute (NCI) P50CA257911National Cancer Institute (NCI) R35CA232113National Cancer Institute (NCI) R37CA251877National Cancer Institute (NCI) T32CA071341National Cancer Institute (NCI) T32CA244125NCI NIH HHS F31 CA284869NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS P50 CA257911NCI NIH HHS R35 CA232113NCI NIH HHS R37 CA251877NCI NIH HHS T32 CA071341NCI NIH HHS T32 CA244125Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PCAN) 15-70-25-BRYAPancreatic Cancer Action Network (PCAN) 22-WG-DERBU.S. Department of Defense (DOD) W81XWH2110693
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly KRAS-addicted cancer. Although KRAS-mutant PDAC is susceptible to treatment with direct RAS inhibitors, drug resistance is an ongoing challenge. KRAS-driven PDAC is dependent on nutrient scavenging pathways such as macropinocytosis to fuel increased metabolic demands. Here, we report on the dynamics of macropinocytosis in response to genetic suppression and pharmacologic inhibition of KRAS and the RAS-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. We show that macropinocytosis is transiently suppressed following acute genetic suppression of KRAS but is rapidly restored and even enhanced under prolonged RAS pathway inhibition. Furthermore, we demonstrate that human PDAC cell lines that have acquired resistance to RAS inhibitors, as well as cell lines derived from KPC tumors with acquired resistance to RAS inhibitors display markedly elevated macropinocytosis. RAS-inhibitor resistant cell lines also display increased abundance of macropinocytosis-related proteins and enhanced albumin uptake and sensitivity to albumin-bound paclitaxel. Mechanistically, this adaptive phenotype is mediated through both phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent and -independent pathways that converge on the activation of RAC1. Our results demonstrate a previously unrecognized link between RAS pathway inhibitor resistance and upregulation of macropinocytosis, underscoring the importance of further elucidating metabolic reprogramming in RASi-R PDAC. SIGNIFICANCE: Macropinocytosis is upregulated following prolonged RAS-inhibitor treatment and in RASi-R models of PDAC via several heterogeneous mechanisms that converge on RAC1 activation and render RASi-R PDAC cell lines more sensitive to nab-paclitaxel.
Indexed as
Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmPancreatic NeoplasmsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPinocytosisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansras ProteinsSignal TransductionUp-RegulationKRAS protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins
Identifiers
PMID42424169
PMCPMC13410306
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390