ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Continuous foraging behavior shapes patch-leaving decisions in pigeons: a 3D tracking study.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal foraging behavior is a key component of successful adaptations to natural environments. Understanding how animals decide to stay near food or to leave it for another food patch gives us insights into the underlying cognitive mechanisms that govern adaptive behaviors. 3D pose tracking was used to determine how pigeons exploit a 4 square meter arena with two separate platforms (i.e. food patches) whose absolute and relative elevations were manipulated. Detailed kinematic features of foraging and traveling behaviors were quantified using automated video tracking, without a need for manual coding. Our computational approach captured continuous, high-dimensional movement patterns and enabled precise quantification of travel costs between patches. Combined with mixed-effects survival analysis, our fine-grained behavioral tracking provided detailed insight into the moment-by-moment dynamics of patch-leaving decisions of pigeons. As expected from behavior optimization models, our results showed a preference to visit a ground food platform first, and longer latencies to leave an elevated platform. Foraging activity significantly decreased throughout the session, with shorter visits, less pecks per visit, and a decrease in inter-peck variability. However, a mixed-effects Cox regression modeled pigeons' patch-leaving probability, demonstrating that current and cumulative foraging parameters between patches significantly enhanced the model's predictive power beyond patch accessibility (i.e., beyond travel costs). This suggests that pigeons integrate both current environmental cues and their individual foraging history when making patch-leaving decisions. Our findings are discussed in relation to the marginal value theorem and optimal foraging theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.