ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Diagnostic algorithm for the imaging evaluation of a solid pancreatic mass: is it malignant?
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic masses comprise a broad spectrum of benign, inflammatory, premalignant, and malignant entities with markedly different prognoses and therapeutic implications. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains the most lethal solid pancreatic neoplasm, whereas inflammatory conditions such as autoimmune pancreatitis and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis may simulate malignancy on imaging, frequently leading to unnecessary surgical resections. Given the increasing detection of pancreatic lesions through widespread use of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging, radiologists play a central role in lesion characterization, risk stratification, and guidance of further diagnostic steps. This review approaches pancreatic mass evaluation not as a catalogue of entities but as a structured diagnostic problem. A six-step algorithm organized around the central clinical question: is it malignant? is presented as the organizing framework of the manuscript, with each subsequent section addressing a specific diagnostic branch of that algorithm. The algorithm assigns a formal confidence level (high, moderate or indeterminate) at each decision node, defined by explicit imaging and clinical criteria with published accuracy data cited where available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.