Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423958›Full record

ReviewAnnals of nuclear medicine2026

Beyond metastases: a mechanism-based guide to misleading ¹³¹I uptake on whole-body scintigraphy.

Andrija Gregov, Anđela Deak, Lucija Lučev, Alfredo Campennì, Stephan Beintner-Skawran, Luca Giovanella, Murat Tuncel, Urs J Muehlematter, Martin W Huellner, Gorana Mirošević and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrija GregovDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10 000, Croatia. andrija.gregov@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6698-1038
Anđela DeakDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10 000, Croatia.
Lucija LučevDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10 000, Croatia.
Alfredo CampennìDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Stephan Beintner-SkawranDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca GiovanellaUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Murat TuncelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Urs J MuehlematterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin W HuellnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gorana MiroševićDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases "Mladen Sekso", University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Petra Petranović OvčaričekDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10 000, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

¹³¹I whole-body scintigraphy (WBS) remains a cornerstone in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). However, radioiodine uptake is not specific, and many benign conditions can result in focal or diffuse radioiodine activity that mimics metastatic disease. A narrative literature review spanning more than five decades was conducted to identify and categorise reported sites of misleading radioiodine uptake on WBS in patients with DTC. Case reports, case series, original studies, and reviews were analysed with particular emphasis on the underlying mechanisms of uptake. The majority of false-positive findings were attributable to non-tumorous conditions, followed by benign neoplasms and, less frequently, non-thyroidal malignancies. Ectopic thyroid tissue was documented at numerous sites beyond classical thyroglossal duct remnants. Although pathological NIS expression was demonstrated in several non-thyroidal tumors, its presence did not consistently correlate with functional iodide transport. No single imaging feature reliably differentiates non-tumorous radioiodine uptake from true metastatic disease. Accurate interpretation, therefore, requires integration of clinical history, biochemical findings, and complementary imaging, particularly single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT). A mechanism-based approach to unexpected radioiodine uptake offers a practical strategy to reduce false-positive interpretations and avoid unnecessary diagnostic procedures.

Indexed as

Differentiated thyroid carcinomaFalse-positive uptakeRadioiodine whole-body scintigraphySodium-iodide symporterSPECT/CT

Identifiers

PMID42423958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.