ReviewAdvances in therapy2026
Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Pulmonary Perspective on Recent Guidelines.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated interstitial lung disease (SARD-ILD) represents a heterogeneous group of pulmonary disorders with substantial effects on morbidity and mortality. The clinical course varies according to the underlying rheumatic disease, radiological phenotype, extent of lung involvement and risk of progression. Although interstitial lung disease is particularly frequent in systemic sclerosis and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, it also significantly contributes to outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's disease and mixed connective tissue disease. Early recognition is essential, as clinically silent disease may progress to irreversible fibrosis, whereas some patients may present with rapidly progressive or progressive fibrosing phenotypes requiring urgent or intensified treatment. Recent American College of Rheumatology/American College of Chest Physicians (ACR/CHEST) and European Respiratory Society/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ERS/EULAR) guidelines provide an important framework for screening, monitoring and management of SARD-ILD, but differ in several clinically relevant aspects. ACR/CHEST adopts a largely risk-based and pragmatic approach, whereas ERS/EULAR places greater emphasis on disease-specific assessment, the central role of high-resolution computed tomography in screening and structured monitoring according to progression risk. In treatment, both guidelines support immunosuppression as the main therapeutic strategy, while recognizing the growing role of antifibrotic therapy in selected patients with fibrotic or progressive disease. The available evidence remains strongest for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease, with important uncertainties persisting across other SARD subtypes. This narrative review summarizes the epidemiology, clinical and radiological phenotypes, and pathobiological basis of SARD-ILD, and critically discusses recent guideline recommendations from a pulmonary perspective. Particular emphasis is placed on translating the differences between the current guidelines into practical multidisciplinary decisions regarding screening, longitudinal assessment, treatment selection and future research priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.