ArticleCJEM2026
Patient displacement during recurrent rural emergency department service interruptions: a 5-year observational case study.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesRural emergency departments (EDs) are essential access points for care in geographically remote communities. In Alberta, equitable access is increasingly challenged by recurrent rural ED service interruptions. This study aimed to characterize the impact of such service interruptions through a case study of a rural community hospital in southern Alberta (Index Site) with a high burden of service interruptions.
methodsAn observational analysis was conducted using national ambulatory care reporting system (NACRS) data from 2019 to 2023. ED visits by Index Site residents were extracted and compared against eight rural comparator communities without reported service interruptions. Service interruptions were identified from provincial public records. ED utilization, displacement to alternate facilities, and presentation characteristics were evaluated.
resultsBetween October 2021 and December 2023, Index Site experienced recurrent ED service interruptions totaling over 3400 h (142 days). During this period, the proportion of ED visits by Index Site residents occurring outside their local ED rose from 9.6% in 2019 to 40.3% in 2023. Compared to rural communities without service interruptions (called Open Sites), Index Site residents demonstrated significantly lower local ED utilization from 2021 to 2023, despite initially higher rates. Displacement patterns evolved: Open Site B absorbed 60.2%-63.5% of displaced visits from 2019 to 2021, then declined during service interruption periods, while Open Site A increased from 12.6% of displaced visits in 2020 to 62.5% in 2023. Canadian triage acuity scale (CTAS) distributions and physician initial assessment rates during service interruption intervals showed ongoing ED utilization, despite reported service interruptions.
conclusionsED service interruptions in Index Site were associated with sustained patient displacement, underscoring the essential role of rural EDs and the strain placed on neighboring centers. This study presents a reproducible framework for evaluating rural ED service interruptions and highlights the need for transparent, province-wide reporting to inform health policy and emergency care planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.