ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2026
Open-source offline-deployable retrieval-augmented large language model for assisting pancreatic cancer staging.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in radiology, but key challenges remain, including data leakage from cloud-based systems, false outputs, and limited reasoning transparency. This study aimed to develop an open-source, offline-deployable retrieval-augmented LLM (RA-LLM) system in which local execution prevents data leakage and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves output accuracy and transparency using reliable external knowledge (REK), demonstrated in pancreatic cancer staging. MATERIALS AND
methodsLlama-3.2 11B and Gemma-3 27B were used as local LLMs, and GPT-4o mini served as a cloud-based comparator. The Japanese pancreatic cancer guideline, written in English, served as REK. Relevant REK excerpts were retrieved to generate retrieval-augmented responses. System performance, including classification accuracy, retrieval metrics, and execution time, was evaluated on 100 simulated pancreatic cancer cases with CT findings described in English, using non-RAG LLMs as baselines. McNemar tests were applied to TNM staging and resectability classification.
resultsRAG improved TNM staging accuracy for all LLMs (GPT-4o mini 61% → 90%, p < 0.001; Llama-3.2 11B 53% → 72%, p < 0.001; Gemma-3 27B 59% → 87%, p < 0.001) and mildly improved resectability classification for GPT-4o mini and Llama-3.2 11B (72% → 84%, p = 0.012; 58% → 73%, p = 0.006), while the improvement for Gemma-3 27B was not evident (77% → 86%, p = 0.093). Gemma-3 27B showed performance comparable to GPT-4o mini. Retrieval performance was high (context recall = 1; context precision = 0.5-1), and local models ran at speeds comparable to the cloud-based GPT-4o mini.
conclusionWe developed an offline-deployable RA-LLM system for pancreatic cancer staging and publicly released its full source code. RA-LLMs outperformed baseline LLMs, and the offline-capable Gemma-3 27B performed comparably to the widely used cloud-based GPT-4o mini.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.