ReviewApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2026
Immobilization of Heavy Metals by Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Key Mechanisms, Driving Factors, and Research Advances.
Review in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) are increasingly recognized as promising biogenic matrices for heavy metal immobilization, but their role is still frequently interpreted through an adsorption-centered perspective. This interpretation limits a mechanistic understanding of why EPS-rich systems often show greater stability and adaptability than conventional biosorbents under complex wastewater conditions. This study proposes to view EPS-mediated heavy metal immobilization as a coupled and adaptive process that integrates rapid adsorption, selective coordination, precipitation, biomineralization, biofilm protection, and microbial regulation. Evidence from recent studies indicates that EPS immobilize heavy metals through ion exchange, electrostatic attraction, coordination complexation, direct precipitation, and metabolically induced biomineralization, while these pathways are jointly governed by EPS composition, functional-group distribution, spatial stratification, pH, salinity, redox state, nutrient balance, metal stress, and quorum sensing. A key point of this study is that it attempts to go beyond describing what EPS do and to explain how EPS convert transient metal capture into more stable immobilization by linking extracellular chemistry, microbial metabolism, and biofilm-scale organization. This framework suggests a different interpretation of prior studies: high adsorption capacity alone should not be treated as a universal performance indicator; instead, EPS performance should be evaluated by capacity, selectivity, post-binding stability, regeneration potential, and tolerance to mixed-metal and saline wastewater conditions. By critically comparing mechanisms, performance ranges, and engineering trade-offs, this review provides a more analytical basis for controllable EPS production, functional optimization, composite design, and resource-oriented wastewater treatment. EPS should be regarded not merely as passive biosorbents, but as adaptive biological interfaces with strong potential for sustainable and scalable heavy metal remediation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423876What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.