ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Treatment Selection Beyond Second Line in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Practical Sequencing of Cytotoxic Salvage Therapy, Anti-angiogenic Agents, Rechallenge Strategies, and Biomarker-Guided Treatments.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment selection beyond second line in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has evolved from empirical salvage therapy to individualized sequencing. Regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab, and fruquintinib have established roles in refractory disease, but their optimal order remains patient-dependent. In parallel, biomarker-guided options for BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, HER2-positive, MSI-H/dMMR, and rare fusion-positive tumors have expanded the treatment framework. After BREAKWATER, BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC should no longer be viewed only as a later-line subgroup, because eligible patients may already have received first-line encorafenib, cetuximab, and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Anti-EGFR rechallenge, preferably guided by circulating tumor DNA, provides another biologically dynamic strategy for selected RAS/BRAF wild-type, left-sided tumors. In Japan, OncoGuide EpiLight has introduced clinically implementable DNA methylation testing, which may complement anti-EGFR sensitivity assessment but does not replace resistance-mutation testing. This review summarizes key evidence and proposes a practical scenario-based framework integrating molecular reassessment, comprehensive genomic profiling, residual toxicity, vascular risk, marrow reserve, frailty, patient preference, and trial access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.