ArticleSports medicine - open2026
Team Cognizant Action: Insights into Developing Team Synergies in Sports.
Article in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Team cognition and collective intelligence describe how individuals in a team interact to achieve shared goals. In team sports, these concepts are crucial for understanding how players coordinate their actions in dynamic match environments. Inferential psychological approaches treat team cognition as an internal mental process and coordinated action as its execution, with limited explanation of how players continuously regulate actions to sustain collective goal-directed behavior. To address this, we propose a reconceptualization of team behavior grounded in the ecological dynamics framework called team cognizant action. We argue that coordinated action is team cognition expressed through direct perception and action couplings between teammates and the match environment. By shifting the unit of analysis to the team-environment system, defined as the interdependent relationship between players and their performance environment within a task, we offer a parsimonious and comprehensive account of team behavior. Within this system, coordination emerges from how players detect ecological information specifying opportunities for collective action. To act on such opportunities requires coordination among players' skills to achieve shared goals. Such coordinated behavior underlies team synergies which in turn operationalize team cognizant action. Consequently, to foster cognizant action, practice sessions should emphasize representative learning design to enhance shared perceptual attunement and collective movement calibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.