ArticleNeurology and therapy2026
Patient Experience with 10 mg Intranasally Administered Zavegepant as an Acute Treatment of Migraine Attacks: Qualitative Research Findings.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMigraine imposes significant burdens on individuals and healthcare systems. While clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of acute treatments, real-world patient experiences offer critical insight into treatment acceptability and impact on quality of life. This study explores patient experience with zavegepant 10 mg intranasal (IN) as an acute treatment for migraine attacks.
methodsAdults with a self-reported migraine diagnosis who had used zavegepant for acute treatment of migraine attacks in the past 3 months participated in semi-structured in-depth interviews. Participants were recruited via a research panel. Interviews explored treatment usage patterns and outcomes. Participants also completed a point allocation exercise, assigning 100 points across seven zavegepant features based on relative importance. Transcripts were analyzed in MAXQDA using content analysis.
resultsFifteen patients participated (mean age = 42; range 23-63 years). Zavegepant was generally perceived as effective, fast-acting, and convenient, contributing to high overall satisfaction. Patients with multiple migraine medications on hand usually choose zavegepant for severe attacks or when they need to continue performing their planned activities. Many reported receiving insufficient guidance from healthcare providers on correct administration timing and technique. Dysgeusia (a bitter, metallic taste) was commonly reported. Most expressed willingness to continue using zavegepant despite dysgeusia, citing significant physical, emotional, and daily functioning improvements. In the point allocation exercise, "freedom from pain" was rated as the most important attribute, three times more important than "nasal spray as mode of administration" and "taste of the medicine."
conclusionOverall, zavegepant 10 mg IN was perceived as an effective and fast-acting acute treatment for migraine attacks. Although side effects such as dysgeusia may delay or reduce use in some patients, most value zavegepant's effectiveness and functional benefits. These findings underscore the need for improved patient education on administration techniques and side effects to optimize real-world outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.