ArticleSurgery today2026
Revisiting the lateral-to-medial approach in robotic surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery has been widely adopted for left-sided colorectal cancer; however, mesenteric mobilization is predominantly performed using the medial-to-lateral approach. This technique can be technically demanding because dissection must be performed within a narrow working space dorsal to the mesenteric vessels, requiring the identification and preservation of the ureter and gonadal vessels. In robotic surgery, arm rigidity and the lack of tactile feedback may increase the risk of inadvertent pressure on the deep retroperitoneal structures. To address these challenges, we describe a lateral-to-medial approach that is optimized for robotic surgery. By utilizing wristed instruments, high-definition three-dimensional visualization, and stable traction, this approach enables mesenteric mobilization in a wider working space. In 19 patients, the mobilization time was comparable to that in the conventional approach, with no unintended deviation of the dissection plane. These findings suggest that the robotic lateral-to-medial approach is technically feasible and may be a useful option for robotic left-sided colorectal resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423786What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.