ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Automatic recognition of anatomical structures and surgical phases in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) using deep learning: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurative treatment of resectable esophageal cancer comprises neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is the preferred technique; however, learning RAMIE is challenging due to the complex chest anatomy, patient positioning and zoomed-in camera view. Computer-aided anatomy recognition holds promise for improving surgical navigation. This study aims to develop real-time anatomy recognition and surgical phase recognition algorithms for the thoracic part of RAMIE using deep learning and to understand the challenges of current state-of-the-art algorithms.
methodsA retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted on prospectively collected RAMIE videos at University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Two datasets were created: an anatomy segmentation dataset with 1504 frames from 53 videos, annotated for eight anatomical classes and four surgical instruments; and a surgical phase dataset, with 38 videos labeled with thirteen distinct phases. Several deep learning models were trained and tested using both datasets.
resultsThe SegNeXt model achieved the most accurate segmentations with an overall overlap score of 0.72 for all classes, of which the surgical instruments were best detectable. The best surgical phase recognition model achieved an overall accuracy of 82.8% and revealed loss of accuracy during phase transitions. Class imbalance affected both datasets which led to less frequent appearing classes performing lowest.
conclusionsThis study identified suitable models for computer-aided, real-time anatomy and surgical tool segmentation and surgical phase recognition for the thoracic part of RAMIE. Acceptable performance was achieved while both datasets are highly complex. Performance is expected to improve by further expanding and diversifying the datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.