ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
The middle hepatic artery: prevalence and origin patterns of a distinct segment 4 artery.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe middle hepatic artery (MHA) is commonly used to describe the artery supplying segment 4 of the liver. Because preservation of segment 4 inflow is important in hepatobiliary surgery, especially in living donor liver transplantation and split liver transplantation, recognition of its presence and origin is clinically relevant. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and origin patterns of the MHA.
methodsA total of 706 abdominal computed tomography angiography examinations were retrospectively reviewed. In this study, the MHA was defined as a separately identifiable arterial branch supplying segment 4 at or near the hepatic hilum. Its presence, origin, and distribution according to the hepatic arterial anatomy observed among MHA-positive cases were recorded.
resultsThe MHA was identified in 430 of 706 cases (60.9%). Among these, the most common origin was the left hepatic artery (54.2%), followed by the right hepatic artery (30.7%). Less frequent origins included the proper hepatic artery (11.2%), replaced left hepatic artery (2.1%), gastroduodenal artery (0.7%), replaced right hepatic artery (0.7%), common hepatic artery (0.2%), and accessory left hepatic artery (0.2%). In cases with a replaced right hepatic artery, the MHA most frequently originated from the left hepatic artery, whereas in cases with a replaced left hepatic artery, it most frequently arose from the right hepatic artery.
conclusionThe MHA was present in approximately three-fifths of cases and showed considerable variability in its origin. When no MHA was separately visualized, this should not be interpreted as absence of arterial perfusion to segment 4, which may also be supplied by intrahepatic or multiple small branches not delineated as a single artery. Recognition of these patterns may improve preoperative vascular assessment in hepatobiliary and transplant surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423769What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.