Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423739›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Development and psychometric validation of the short-form thai version of the spine oncology study group outcomes questionnaire (TH-SOSGOQ-8D).

Sarunya Poolpol, Borriwat Santipas, Korawish Mekariya, Sitaporn Youngkong, Montarat Thavorncharoensap, Phantipa Sakthong, Warayos Trathitephun, Siravich Suvithayasiri, Komkrich Wattanapaiboon, Sirichai Wilartratsami and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trends and postoperative complications of spinal metastasis surgery in Thailand between 2015 and 2024: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarunya PoolpolDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Borriwat SantipasDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Korawish MekariyaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sitaporn YoungkongDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Montarat ThavorncharoensapDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phantipa SakthongDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Warayos TrathitephunOrthopedic Center, Chulabhorn Hospital, HRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siravich SuvithayasiriOrthopedic Center, Chulabhorn Hospital, HRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Komkrich WattanapaiboonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Chon Buri, Thailand.
Sirichai WilartratsamiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Panya LuksanapruksaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. cutecarg@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9554-4259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designMulticenter Secondary Analysis. PURPOSE: To assess psychometric properties of a short-form Thai Version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (TH-SOSGOQ-8D) among Thai patients. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although an 8-item short-form instrument was previously developed to calculate health utilities from the SOSGOQ-8D and to reduce patient burden, a gap remains regarding its local validation, serving as a critical preliminary step before calculating local-specific health utilities and QALYs.

methodsData for this secondary analysis were extracted from the existing validated prospective multicenter TH-SOSGOQ 2.0 database between 2018 and 2020, comprising the full analytic cohort of 68 patients and the reliability and construct validity cohort of 64 patients. The internal consistency of the instrument was evaluated through Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was reported by Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) over a one-week apart, beginning at 12 weeks post-treatment. Concurrent validity was established by correlating the short form against the original version via Pearson's correlation, whereas construct validity was examined against the EQ-5D-5 L using Spearman's rho.

resultsSixty-eight participants were analyzed, reporting an average age of 57 years; 55.9% were female. Overall internal consistency was 0.832. The ICCs varied from 0.52 to 0.85, indicating moderate to excellent reliability. The TH-SOSGOQ8D showed good concurrent validity with the 27-item version, with Pearson's correlation coefficients between 0.757 and 1.000 for domains, and 0.907 for the total score. Construct validity was demonstrated by significant Spearman's rho correlations between related domains: physical function with usual activities (0.66); neurologic with mobility (0.56) and self-care (0.54); pain with pain/discomfort (0.63); mental health with anxiety/depression (0.64); social function with pain/discomfort (0.61).

conclusionsAlthough extracted from the existing validated Thai SOSGOQ 2.0 dataset, the TH-SOSGOQ-8D demonstrated acceptable to excellent psychometric properties. Despite being reduced to 8 items, it retained the key constructs of the original 27-item instrument. It may therefore be suitable as a disease-specific measure for health economic evaluation and clinical management of spinal tumors among the Thai population.

Indexed as

Quality of lifeReliabilitySOSGOQ-8DSpinal metastasisThailandValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.