Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423721›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Bacteriuria in patients with indwelling urinary catheters-when and how to treat? : Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infections].

W Vahlensieck, W Fabry, H Piechota, K Becher, K Naber

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

W VahlensieckKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Andrologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland. Winfried.Vahlensieck@t-online.de.
W Fabry, Oberhausen, Deutschland.
H PiechotaKlinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und operative Uro-Onkologie, Johannes Wesling-Universitätsklinikum, Minden, Deutschland.
K BecherAbteilung allgemeine und geriatrische Rehabilitation, Klinik Wartenberg, Wartenberg, Deutschland.
K NaberUrologische Klinik, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) represents one of the most common healthcare-associated infections. In patients with indwelling urinary catheters, bacterial colonization frequently occurs in nearly all patients and increases with the duration of catheterization. A crucial clinical challenge is the differentiation between catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria (CA-ABU) and symptomatic local or systemic catheter-associated urinary tract infection (L- or S‑CAUTI). While CA-ABU in general does not require treatment, CAUTIs should be treated appropriately. The pathogenesis is largely determined by microbial biofilm formation on the catheter surface. Biofilms facilitate persistent bacterial colonization and contribute to reduced susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. The microbial spectrum commonly includes Enterobacterales such as E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus spp. as well as Enterococcus species with an increasing number of multidrug-resistant species. Major risk factors include the duration of catheterization, frequent manipulation of the drainage system, insufficient hygiene, and patient-related factors such as advanced age, comorbidities, immunosuppression, and diuresis. Prevention strategies therefore focus primarily on avoiding unnecessary catheterization, short duration of catheterization, and implementing standardized catheter care protocols. In cases of suspected CAUTI, urinalysis and urine culture should be performed, ideally after catheter replacement. Antibiotic therapy should be guided by clinical severity (local or systemic infection), local resistance patterns, and microbiological findings. Catheter removal or replacement should be considered. The overall goal is effective infection control while minimizing unnecessary antibiotic use to reduce antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

BacteriuriaCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingUrinary CathetersUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsHumansRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceBiofilmsCatheter handlingMultimorbidityNosocomial infections

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.