Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423720›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Geriatric assessments and their practical application in uro-oncology : How do we decide on prostate cancer treatment in an age-appropriate way?]

Christian Fiebig, Andreas Manseck, Joachim Stein, Alexander Piotrowski, Michael Fröhner, Martin Umbehr, Marius Butea-Bocu, Andreas Wiedemann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian FiebigUrologische und Kinderurologische Klinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. christian.fiebig@uk-erlangen.de.
Andreas ManseckKlinik für Urologie, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Deutschland.
Joachim SteinKlinik für Urologie, Klinikum Großburgwedel, Burgwedel, Deutschland.
Alexander PiotrowskiUrologie und Kinderurologie, Klinikum Bad Hersfeld, Bad Hersfeld, Deutschland.
Michael FröhnerKlinik für Urologie, Zeisigwaldkliniken Bethanien Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland.
Martin UmbehrKlinik für Urologie, Stadtspital Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.
Marius Butea-BocuUrologisches Kompetenzzentrum, Kliniken Hartenstein, Bad Wildungen, Deutschland.
Andreas WiedemannUrologische Klinik, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Witten gGmbH, Lehrstuhl für Geriatrie, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of geriatric patients with urological cancers is becoming increasingly important due to rising life expectancy and the growing incidence of such diseases. However, treatment decisions are often based primarily on chronological age or clinical guidelines, whilst insufficient consideration is given to the functional reserve of older patients. Geriatric patients exhibit specific physiological changes such as impaired renal or liver function, sarcopenia, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, malnutrition and cognitive impairments, which increase the risk of postoperative complications, functional decline, delirium, falls and the need for care. Standard therapies can therefore lead to significant functional limitations despite their oncological benefits. The aim of modern uro-oncological treatment is not only to prolong life but, in particular, to preserve autonomy, mobility and quality of life. For the purpose of individualised treatment planning, current guidelines recommend a stepwise geriatric assessment. This begins with screening using the G8 and mini-COG©, followed by a simplified geriatric assessment or a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) if any abnormalities are detected. Classifying patients as fit, vulnerable or frail enables risk-adapted treatment decisions and targeted geriatric interventions. This can improve functional reserves, reduce complications and potentially avoid the need for long-term care.

Indexed as

AssessmentMalnutritionMultimorbidityPolypharmacySarcopenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.