ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026
Psychologists in primary care: A scoping review exploring the views and experiences of patients and professionals on psychology provision in primary care.
Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychologists in primary care have the potential to deliver interventions targeting behavioural risk factors for long-term conditions and can support self-management of physical and mental health conditions. The British Psychological Society recommends that psychology be embedded routinely into primary care. However, this is not yet implemented. We aimed to explore how the role of psychology professionals has been co-located/integrated within primary care and synthesise views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and psychology professionals to inform future practice. A scoping review was performed using CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. The searches included articles published in English from 2010 onwards. Reference lists of included articles were screened, and forward citation tracking was carried out to identify further articles. Seventy-two studies were included, and patients and primary care staff described psychology professional provision in primary care as positive. Having co-located/integrated psychology professionals has the potential to increase and/or improve access to care, improve patient knowledge/skills and reduce primary care staff workload and stress. There were development opportunities for primary care and psychology staff, and quality of care was described as improved. Psychology professionals, although satisfied, reported challenges (e.g. role demands and organisational challenges) and training needs. The review discusses practical suggestions, implementation considerations and further research needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.