ArticleXenotransplantation
Perspectives of Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist Regarding Willingness to Undergo Xenotransplantation.
Article in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundXenotransplantation, the use of genetically modified pigs as organ donors, is entering clinical trials in kidney transplantation. Although the medical community has long considered xenotransplant a potential solution to the organ shortage, the perspective of potential recipient's is not well described.
methodsWe distributed a survey to patients > 18 years of age on our kidney transplant waitlist assessing the following: demographics, insurance status, current waitlist status, transplant history, knowledge of xenotransplantation and recent xenotransplant news, willingness to accept a xenokidney, and reservations regarding xenotransplantation. Surveys were administered through three different modalities: email, electronic medical record patient portal, and physical mailings. A total of 717 patients were surveyed between April and June 2024. Quantitative statistical analysis was performed as well as sentiment and thematic analysis of free-text responses.
resultsOf 717 eligible individuals, 79 responses were received (response rate 11%), 59% were electronic and 41% were sent through physical mail. Respondents were 42% female, 25% African American, 85% with at least some college education, 46% with public insurance, and 58% reported religion as very important. Most respondents noted some awareness of xenotransplantation (77%) and many expressed a favorable impression (62%). Survey modality demonstrated a racial difference in response, with African American patients more likely to respond via physical mail (p = 0.014). Overall, the majority of respondents expressed a willingness to accept a xenokidney if outcomes were comparable to allografts (81%) or as a bridge to allotransplantation (65%), with similar findings on the sentiment and thematic analysis. The most common concerns expressed included organ rejection and incompatibility (30%), anxiety over the lack of long-term outcome data (25%) and organ durability (20%).
conclusionsMost patients on our kidney transplant wait list reported positive attitudes toward xenotransplantation and were willing to consider it under various circumstances, independent of anticipated time to transplant or reported time on the wait list. Knowledge of recent transplant events appeared to influence patient perceptions of xenotransplant. Using multiple survey methods was important to capture a sample more representative of our waitlist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.