Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423492›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2026

Microcore Skin Biopsies: A Novel, Micro-Invasive Skin Biopsy Technique Yielding Full-Thickness Histology.

Rebecca Lapides, Ga Ram Ahn, Kenechi Iwelumo, Heather Downs, Roger Sumner, Michael McCormack, William G Austen, Elisabeth Roider, Michael Wang-Evers, Dieter Manstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebecca LapidesDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5871-5680
Ga Ram AhnDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-4699
Kenechi IwelumoDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Heather DownsDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Roger SumnerDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael McCormackDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
William G AustenDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elisabeth RoiderDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael Wang-EversDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-4891
Dieter MansteinDepartment of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4508-045X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPunch biopsies are considered the primary technique to obtain full-thickness skin specimens for dermatologic diagnoses. However, limitations include scarring, sampling error, poor margin identification, and post-sampling deformations.

objectivesTo introduce a novel micro-biopsy technique utilizing a modified hypodermic needle to achieve full-thickness skin micro-columns and a streamlined post-sampling process for histological analysis.

methodsEx-vivo skin biopsies were taken using a modified hypodermic needle and compared to 3 mm punch biopsies. They were fixed and processed inside the needle, resulting in a firm, columnar sample, which was then sectioned, stained, and imaged. Dimensions and horizontal shrinkage were also calculated.

resultsThe technique consistently yielded uniform, columnar-shaped histological samples. These sections were of sufficient quality to perform staining with a significantly smaller horizontal shrinkage rate compared to standard 3 mm punch biopsies.

conclusionsWe demonstrate a novel technique for a skin micro-biopsy that allows for fixation and processing of the tissue inside the sampling instrument, yielding small, full-thickness columnar skin histological samples that can be used for dermatological diagnosis with minimal post-sampling deformation. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Punch biopsies are considered the primary technique to obtain full-thickness skin specimens in order to diagnose skin conditions. However, scarring associated with skin biopsies and the deformations that happen to samples during processing pose persistent challenges. To minimize invasiveness, sub-millimeter skin punch biopsies have been introduced, but there has been no standardized, widely adoptable technique to utilize sub-millimeter skin punch biopsies to make diagnoses. Here, we introduce a novel skin biopsy needle that obtains skin samples that are less than 0.5 mm in diameter, which is below the scarring threshold, as well as a processing technique to easily fix, stain, and image the samples to make skin diagnoses.

Indexed as

SkinBiopsyBiopsy, NeedleEquipment DesignHumansNeedlesfull‐thicknessmicrocoreminimally invasivepunch biopsyskin biopsy

Identifiers

PMID42423492
PMCPMC13348449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.