ArticleJournal of vision2026
Feature misbinding underlying serial-order effects of visuospatial working memory.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate processing of incoming visual information in serial order is fundamental to visual cognition. Prior studies have demonstrated primacy and recency effects in tasks requiring the serial recall of visual stimuli such as letters, digits, words, or locations. However, there is ongoing debate about whether these primacy/recency effects on working memory retrieval reflect variable representational precision for multiple items in memory or misbinding of item features (e.g., location) and their ordinal position. This study sought to examine potential sources contributing to serial-position effects in visuospatial working memory using eye tracking and statistical modeling approaches. In two eye-tracking experiments, we measured the latency and endpoint error of serial-order memory-guided saccades under varying cue conditions (order cue vs. quadrant cue) from a total of 92 participants. The first (primary) memory-guided saccade showed primacy and recency effects on endpoint error, latency, and transposition error in the order-cue condition, but not in the quadrant-cue condition. Probabilistic modeling of memory-guided saccade distribution showed a better fit of a standard (non-swapping) model to the quadrant-cue condition and a swap model to the order-cue condition. These findings indicate that visuospatial working memory representation varies across serial positions primarily due to location-serial-position misbinding rather than variable memory precision about location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.