Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423360›Full record

ReviewActa dermato-venereologica2026

The Role of RCM and LC-OCT in Genodermatoses Associated with Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Francesco Piscazzi, Cristina Carrera, Josep Riera-Monroig, Susana Puig, Josep Malvehy, Javiera Anker, Marco Ardigò

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesco PiscazziDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy; Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-6350
Cristina CarreraDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain; Melanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1608-8820
Josep Riera-MonroigDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9265-1019
Susana PuigDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain; Melanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1337-9745
Josep MalvehyDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain; Melanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6998-914X
Javiera AnkerDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain; Melanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6959-7250
Marco ArdigòDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy; Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy. marco.ardigo@hunimed.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-5772-4937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with genodermatoses, such as nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, familial atypical multiple mole and melanoma syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum and ichthyosis with confetti, face a high risk of skin malignancies. While dermoscopy significantly improves diagnostic accuracy compared to clinical examination, its specificity remains limited when evaluating ambiguous lesions in these complex patients. This narrative review examines the role of reflectance confocal microscopy and line-field confocal optical coherence tomography in high-risk populations. By enabling the in vivo visualization of histologic-like features at cellular resolution, these noninvasive imaging technologies overcome the limitations of dermoscopy. The analysis of illustrative cases demonstrates that integrating these tools enhances both sensitivity and specificity, allowing for a precise differentiation between true malignancies and benign mimics. While reflectance confocal microscopy remains the standard for melanocytic criteria, line-field confocal optical coherence tomography complements it by overcoming depth limitations. Consequently, the use of combined noninvasive imaging supports a more conservative management strategy, potentially reducing the number of unnecessary excisions while ensuring the timely detection of skin cancer in patients with rare genetic syndromes.

Indexed as

DermoscopySkin NeoplasmsTomography, Optical CoherenceDiagnosis, DifferentialGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID42423360
PMCPMC13347383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.