ReviewActa dermato-venereologica2026
The Role of RCM and LC-OCT in Genodermatoses Associated with Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review.
Review in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with genodermatoses, such as nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, familial atypical multiple mole and melanoma syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum and ichthyosis with confetti, face a high risk of skin malignancies. While dermoscopy significantly improves diagnostic accuracy compared to clinical examination, its specificity remains limited when evaluating ambiguous lesions in these complex patients. This narrative review examines the role of reflectance confocal microscopy and line-field confocal optical coherence tomography in high-risk populations. By enabling the in vivo visualization of histologic-like features at cellular resolution, these noninvasive imaging technologies overcome the limitations of dermoscopy. The analysis of illustrative cases demonstrates that integrating these tools enhances both sensitivity and specificity, allowing for a precise differentiation between true malignancies and benign mimics. While reflectance confocal microscopy remains the standard for melanocytic criteria, line-field confocal optical coherence tomography complements it by overcoming depth limitations. Consequently, the use of combined noninvasive imaging supports a more conservative management strategy, potentially reducing the number of unnecessary excisions while ensuring the timely detection of skin cancer in patients with rare genetic syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.