Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423358›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026

Recurrence of Basal Cell Carcinoma across Different Treatment Modalities: A Nationwide Study with 8 Years of Follow-up and Modelled Prediction.

Johan Sieborg, Emily Wenande, Alexander Egeberg, Henrik Sølvsten, Ulrikke Lei, Emilie Westerlin Kjeldsen, Merete Haedersdal

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johan SieborgDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark. Johan.sieborg@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-8221-4760
Emily WenandeDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5928-5042
Alexander EgebergDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8257-1816
Henrik SølvstenDermatology Centre North, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0004-6790-2073
Ulrikke LeiDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5095-1280
Emilie Westerlin KjeldsenDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7112-9387
Merete HaedersdalDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1250-2035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the rising incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), few studies have compared treatment outcomes or predicted recurrences using nationwide real-world datasets. Hence, the objective was to investigate and compare recurrence rates of nodular BCC (nBCC) and superficial BCC (sBCC) following treatment with standard excision (SE), curettage, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy and imiquimod. Additionally, we identified predictors of BCC 2 year recurrence using machine-learning. The study examined BCCs treated in state-funded, office-based dermatology practices registered in the Danish Skin Cancer Registry from 2014 to 2024. A total of 131,119 tumours were included, comprising 100,221 nBCCs and 30,898 sBCCs. For nBCC, the lowest rate of recurrence was observed for SE, with an 8-year cumulative recurrence rate (CRR) of 16.5% (95% confidence interval: 14.4-19.0%) and hazard ratio of 0.80 (0.76-0.84) compared with curettage. For sBCC, both SE and curettage had similarly low 8 year CRRs of 16.3% (12.7-20.8%) and 16.3% (15.2 17.5%), respectively, with no significant difference in hazard. The machine-learning model identified key predictors of BCC recurrence, including facial location, larger tumour size, having a high number of hospital-registered diagnoses and short distance to dermatological clinics. These findings highlight the impact of treatment selection and patient-specific factors in guiding dermatologists towards optimal BCC management.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSkin NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCryotherapyCurettageDenmarkFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImiquimodMaleMiddle AgedPhotochemotherapyPredictive Learning ModelsImiquimod

Identifiers

PMID42423358
PMCPMC13347380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.