ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Cross-dataset annotation harmonization for cell-type hierarchy construction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSingle-cell transcriptomic datasets annotate cell types with diverse schemes and varying resolution. This poses challenges in building unified hierarchical cell-type structures and hinders integration of large-scale datasets. To address this, several computational methods have been developed to harmonize cell type annotations across datasets and build data-driven hierarchies of cell types.
resultsHere, we benchmarked three state-of-the-art methods: scHPL, treeArches, and CellHint. We evaluated these methods across five simulated scenarios and five real-world scenarios across cell types and organs. To assess harmonization results, we designed three metrics, Annotation Harmonization F1-score (AH-F1), Tree Edit Distance Similarity and Parent-Children Branches Similarity, comparing the constructed cell-type hierarchies and the knowledge-based ones. Based on the benchmarking results, we found that methods performed well in simulated scenarios but still have room for improvement in complex real-world data. Thus, we developed OTHarmonizer, a tool based on partial optimal transport (OT) for cell-type harmonization and hierarchy construction. OTHarmonizer excels in accurately capturing equivalent and hierarchical relationships between cell types, offering a more effective approach for the cell-type hierarchy construction across datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The simulated and real-world datasets in the benchmark are available on https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/OTHarmonizer/28243205. The source codes for the benchmark and OTHarmonizer are available online on GitHub at https://github.com/Duck-Boss/OTHarmonizer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.