Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423273›Full record

ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2026

Long-Term Incidence of Peri-Implant Conditions: 25-Year Results of The Bernese Prospective Cohort Study.

Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Andrea Roccuzzo, Clemens Raabe, Vivianne Chappuis, Daniel Buser, Manrique Fonseca, Giovanni E Salvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emilio Couso-QueirugaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, University of Bern School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9989-4483
Andrea RoccuzzoShanghai Perio-Implant Innovation Center, Institute of Integrated Oral, Craniofacial and Sensory Research, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-0860
Clemens RaabeDepartment of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, University of Bern School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2659-3505
Vivianne ChappuisDepartment of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, University of Bern School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel BuserDepartment of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, University of Bern School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
Manrique FonsecaDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, University of Bern School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-0515
Giovanni E SalviDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

International Team for Implantology 1574-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess 25-year implant survival, success rates, peri-implant conditions, and variables influencing peri-implant mucositis (PM), peri-implantitis (PI), and loss of osseointegration.

methodsPartially edentulous patients rehabilitated with tissue-level implant-supported prostheses were evaluated. Calibrated examiners performed clinical and radiographic assessments, and potential variables for PM and PI were analyzed at the final follow-up.

resultsAt the 10- and 25-year follow-ups, 303 and 159 patients with 511 and 252 implants, respectively, were included. Implant failure (IF) was 1.2% at 10 years and 6.0% at 25 years, with implant survival rates of 98.8% and 94.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). Implant success rates ranged from 97.0% at 10 years to 90.8% at 25 years (p < 0.001). IF due to loss of osseointegration increased from 0.6% to 3.6% at the implant level and from 1.0% to 2.5% at the patient level, and were located only in premolar or molar sites. At implant level, peri-implant health (PH) was 14.4% at 10 and 25 years (p = 1.00), while PM decreased from 82.1% to 76.5% (p = 0.08), and PI increased from 3.5% to 9.1% (p = 0.001). At patient level, PH remained stable between 10 and 25 years, ranging from 10.0% to 10.3% (p = 0.94), while PM decreased from 80.0% to 71.6% (p = 0.06), and PI increased from 10.0% to 18.1% (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, history of periodontitis (OR = 3.87) and facial mucosal thickness (OR = 0.42) were associated with PM, whereas facial mucosal thickness was associated with PI (OR = 0.02).

conclusionsAfter 25 years, implant survival and success exceeded 90%. Loss of osseointegration accounted for approximately 60% of IF. While PI and IF increased over time, PM decreased but remained prevalent.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsPeri-ImplantitisAdultAgedCohort StudiesDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDental Restoration FailureFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyMaleMiddle AgedOsseointegrationProspective StudiesDental Implantsdental implantsperi‐implantitisphenotypetitanium

Identifiers

PMID42423273
PMCPMC13348018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.