Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423266›Full record

ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2026

Long-Term Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation Explantation: A 12-Year Experience at a High-Volume Tertiary Center.

Carly Fiorido, Mario Henrique Bitar Siqueira, Mohammed Aldoukhi, Nojoud Alamri, Eviatar Fields, Naeem Bhojani, Bilal Chughtai, Omar Buksh, Sagi Shprits, Katherine Lajkosz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carly FioridoUniversity Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mario Henrique Bitar SiqueiraDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mohammed AldoukhiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nojoud AlamriDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eviatar FieldsFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-4644
Naeem BhojaniDivision of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2679-2635
Bilal ChughtaiPlainview Hospital, Smith Institute of Urology, Northwell Health, Syosset, New York, USA.
Omar BukshDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sagi ShpritsDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Katherine LajkoszDepartment of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dean EltermanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-7783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a therapeutic option offered to patients with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) or non-obstructive urinary retention, as an alternative treatment for refractory medical management. It allows for electrical stimulation of inhibitory circuits that modulate the micturition reflex and improve lower urinary tract symptoms. Despite high efficacy and safety, explantation remains a challenge clinically as it is unknown which factors predict explantation. Herein, we sought to understand the factors influencing SNM explantation.

methodsWe conducted a long-term retrospective cohort study of 587 patients receiving SNM at one academic tertiary care center in Toronto, Ontario, performed by one surgeon.

resultsThe Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated explantation-free survival probabilities of 97% (95% CI 96%-99%) at 1 year, 92% (90%-95%) at 3 years, and 81% (77%-86%) at 5 years. We did not determine any variables independently associated with time nor risk of explantation. The most common indication for explantation was loss of efficacy (57.7%), followed by patient preference (16.7%) and pain (16.7%).

conclusionExplantation after SNM occurs in a minority of patients, and is largely attributable to a loss of sustained therapeutic efficacy over time.

Indexed as

Device RemovalElectric Stimulation TherapyLumbosacral PlexusUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary RetentionAdultAgedFemaleHospitals, High-VolumeHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective Studiesexplantationlower urinary tract symptomsoveractive bladderSacral neuromodulationSNM

Identifiers

PMID42423266
PMCPMC13686592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.