Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423252›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Inferring variant-specific effective reproduction numbers from combined case and sequencing data.

Marlin D Figgins, Trevor Bedford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marlin D FigginsVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0686-0816
Trevor BedfordVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4039-5794

Funding

National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE- 1762114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately estimating relative transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 variants remains a scientific and public health priority. Recent studies have used the sample proportions of different variants from genetic sequence data to describe variant frequency dynamics and relative transmission rates, but frequencies alone cannot capture the rich epidemiological behavior of SARS-CoV-2. Here, we extend methods for inferring the effective reproduction number of an epidemic using confirmed case data to jointly estimate variant-specific effective reproduction numbers and frequencies of co-circulating variants using cases and sequences across states in the United States from January 2021 to March 2022. Our method can be used to infer structured relationships between effective reproduction numbers across time series, allowing us to estimate fixed variant-specific growth advantages. We use this model to estimate the effective reproduction number of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants of interest in the United States, and to estimate consistent growth advantages of particular variants across different locations.

Indexed as

Basic Reproduction NumberCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Bayes TheoremHumansUnited Statesbayesian statisticsepidemiologyglobal healthinfectious diseasemathematical epidemiologymicrobiologySARS-CoV-2viruses

Identifiers

PMID42423252
PMCPMC13349379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.