ArticleCognitive science2026
Mapping Concepts Onto Linguistic Structure: The Case of Animacy.
Article in Cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A central question in cognitive science is how speakers map meaning onto syntactic structure. Recent research examining the active-passive alternation suggests that conceptual features such as animacy influence sentence structure indirectly by influencing how relational meanings such as thematic roles map onto sentences. The current study examined whether animacy directly influences linear order priming in coordinated noun phrases, which lack thematic roles. In a picture-description task, Experiment 1 showed that the linear order of noun coordinates (e.g., A thief and a lorry vs. A lorry and a thief) could be primed based on animacy order (animate-first vs. inanimate-first) and/or spatial naming order (left-to-right vs. right-to-left). Experiment 2 provided evidence for direct mapping: the prime's animacy order, but not its spatial naming order, was more likely to persist when either the animate or inanimate noun was repeated from prime to target. This contrasts with findings from the active-passive alternation, showing that only verb, not noun, repetition enhances structural persistence. These findings reveal distinct pathways through which feature-based and relational meanings are mapped onto linguistic structure during language production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.