Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423195›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2026

Mapping Concepts Onto Linguistic Structure: The Case of Animacy.

Kumiko Fukumura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kumiko FukumuraSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1475-9304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in cognitive science is how speakers map meaning onto syntactic structure. Recent research examining the active-passive alternation suggests that conceptual features such as animacy influence sentence structure indirectly by influencing how relational meanings such as thematic roles map onto sentences. The current study examined whether animacy directly influences linear order priming in coordinated noun phrases, which lack thematic roles. In a picture-description task, Experiment 1 showed that the linear order of noun coordinates (e.g., A thief and a lorry vs. A lorry and a thief) could be primed based on animacy order (animate-first vs. inanimate-first) and/or spatial naming order (left-to-right vs. right-to-left). Experiment 2 provided evidence for direct mapping: the prime's animacy order, but not its spatial naming order, was more likely to persist when either the animate or inanimate noun was repeated from prime to target. This contrasts with findings from the active-passive alternation, showing that only verb, not noun, repetition enhances structural persistence. These findings reveal distinct pathways through which feature-based and relational meanings are mapped onto linguistic structure during language production.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLanguageLinguisticsHumansSemanticsAnimacyEvent cognitionLanguage productionStructural primingVisual context

Identifiers

PMID42423195
PMCPMC13347751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.