ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Pangenomic analyses in the cultivated grapevine confirm high genomic collinearity and extensive dispensable gene content likely involved in adaptation.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pangenomes have now been developed for several horticultural crops, yet the extent to which genome diversity in sequence and organization contribute to plant adaptation and major agronomic traits remains poorly understood. Here, we assembled the genomes of 9 cultivated grapevine varieties and compared the genomes of 15 cultivated grapevine varieties for variation in gene and TE content. We found that genomic collinearity is highly conserved among varieties. We still observed substantial variation across genomes. Notably, we identified across varieties 55,662 orthologous genes, of which 55.3% appears to be dispensable. Dispensable genes are enriched for functions related to adaptation to biotic and abiotic constraints, suggesting that they may play a role in adaptation. Comparing our results with a recently published study, we found substantial differences with ∼12.6% of the genes we classified as core genes being classified as dispensable genes in this other study. We then constructed a pangenome graph and used it to performed genome-wide association studies for 3 important traits in grapevine production, which allowed us to include large structural variants as markers in the analyses. We identified 32 loci that we did not detect when we used the PN40024 genome as a reference, 20 of which are newly reported associations. Overall, our results indicates that despite recent advances in characterizing plant pangenomes, current gene classification into core and dispensable gene categories should be taken with caution. They also highlight the value of incorporating structural variants into GWAS, to better characterize the genetic architecture of agronomic traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.