ArticleJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2026
Contributing Factors to Severe Workplace Violence in Forensic Psychiatry: A Longitudinal Retrospective Analysis of Incident Reports.
Article in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsychiatric nurses in forensic psychiatric units encounter high levels of workplace violence, but less is known about how ward routines and environmental factors relate to incident severity. AIM/QUESTION: To identify temporal, routine-related, work-related and environmental factors associated with severe reported workplace violence incidents in a Finnish forensic psychiatric hospital.
methodThis longitudinal retrospective study analysed 956 workplace violence reports from 2020-2024 using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction and inductive content analysis of narratives from incidents involving outdoor activities.
resultsSevere reported incidents were associated with time of day (FDR-adjusted p = 0.030, V = 0.12), incidents involving outdoor activities (FDR-adjusted p = 0.030, V = 0.08), incident location (FDR-adjusted p < 0.001, V = 0.28) and ward (FDR-adjusted p < 0.001, V = 0.46). Incidents involving outdoor activities were more often classified as severe and frequently involved physical violence. DISCUSSION: Daytime and afternoon periods, incidents involving outdoor activities and specific ward locations were associated with a higher proportion of severe reported incidents, suggesting that routine and environmental factors shape incident severity. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the single-site retrospective design, voluntary reporting, possible repeated incidents involving the same patients and subjective classification of some reports. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Targeted nurse-led prevention should focus on incidents involving outdoor activities, afternoon peaks and location-specific controls to support safety in forensic psychiatric wards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.