ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Decoding the allosteric grammar of protein kinases: A dual-stream framework integrating protein language models and energy landscape frustration analysis.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding the allosteric grammar of protein kinases: A dual-stream framework integrating protein language models and energy landscape frustration analysis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The spatial and energetic encoding of allosteric regulatory sites remains a major challenge in structural biology, frequently representing a "blind spot" for sequence-based artificial intelligence (AI) models. We present a protein language model (PLM)-guided approach complemented by the energy landscape frustration analysis as a dual-stream framework to investigate the relationship between AI prediction of binding sites and biophysical organization of regulatory pockets across the human kinome. By probing a fine-tuned residue-level PLM classifier across 453 kinase structures, a clear performance gap is discovered between highly predictable orthosteric pockets (Types I, I.5, and II) and poorly resolved distal allosteric sites (Type IV). Rather than attempting to interpret this blind spot through internal AI attributions alone, we use independent local frustration profiles to analyze the underlying physics of these sites. We determine that the detectability of orthosteric and allosteric binding sites reflects their energetic embedding within the protein energy landscape. Orthosteric catalytic sites reside within minimally frustrated, optimized energetic regions that are consistently detected with high confidence. In contrast, allosteric sites are enriched in neutrally frustrated zones, producing diffuse and context-dependent predictions. We demonstrate that this neutral frustration of functional regions acts as a biophysical lubricant, facilitating the conformational plasticity required for regulatory transitions while simultaneously eroding the coevolutionary signals exploited by PLMs. Atomic-resolution analysis of abelson murine leukemia (ABL) kinase spanning multiple conformational states and complexes bound to diverse ligands provides mechanistic validation of this principle. The myristoyl allosteric pocket in ABL remains neutrally frustrated across complexes with physiological ligands, chemically diverse modulators, from allosteric inhibitors to activators, and conformations engaged with SH2-SH3 regulatory domains. We propose that allosteric sites are encoded in persistent neutrally frustrated regions optimized for context-dependent regulatory modulation. This study reveals how the organization of the protein energy landscape shapes universal "allosteric grammar" and algorithmic detectability of regulatory binding sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.