ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2026
Synthetic lethality targets in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: prevalence and limitations of liquid biopsy detection in a minority-serving cancer center.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsSynthetic lethality (SL) exploits genetic vulnerabilities in cancer cells, offering therapeutic opportunities beyond conventional targets. While BRCA/poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition is FDA-approved for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the prevalence of other actionable SL targets remains poorly characterized. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 260 PDAC patients at the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center (2017-2022); 74 underwent somatic sequencing (54 tissue, 17 liquid biopsy) and 117 underwent germline testing. The cohort included 11% Native American patients. We characterized eight SL gene targets and compared mutation detection between biopsy methods.
resultsTP53 mutations were identified in 73% of patients and CDKN2A was the most prevalent SL target (46%), followed by SMAD4 (24%), MTAP (15%), and ARID1A (14%). Liquid biopsy significantly underdetected key alterations: KRAS detection decreased from 93% (tissue) to 47% (liquid,
conclusionsMultiple SL targets beyond BRCA exist in PDAC. Liquid biopsy inadequately detects critical alterations, particularly deletions. Native American patients demonstrated preliminary molecular differences warranting validation in larger studies. Tissue-based molecular profiling will be essential for comprehensive patient selection as SL-targeted therapies advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.