ReviewBritish journal of haematology2026
Integrating novel therapeutic strategies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Driving disease-directed progress.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating novel therapeutic strategies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Driving disease-directed progress.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, there has been a substantial increase in the diversity and number of therapeutic options for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). While many remain within the clinical trial arena, the clinician and patient community have seen more approvals reaching the clinic and a rethink on how best we should be approaching these disorders is required. In parallel, there needs to be a paradigm shift in end-point considerations within MPN clinical trial design, with a growing emphasis on longer term disease stability and modification, molecular responses, histomorphological modification, reductions in complications (e.g. thrombotic complications or disease transformation) and improved survival alongside the conventional goals such as haematological responses and symptom and spleen improvements where relevant. Given the heterogeneity of these disorders, with often marked intrapatient variability, greater consideration must be given to optimised sequencing strategies and rational combination approaches and, importantly, an emphasis on patient-specific trajectories. In this review, we appraise the contemporary therapeutic armamentarium across the MPN spectrum and explore how these advances may best facilitate increasing personalised approaches in an evolving and complex treatment landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42422927What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.