Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422927›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of haematology2026

Integrating novel therapeutic strategies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Driving disease-directed progress.

Trung Q Ngo, Maria Georgiou, Donal P McLornan, Claire N Harrison

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Trung Q NgoDepartment of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9124-8981
Maria GeorgiouDepartment of Haematology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3144-6741
Donal P McLornanDepartment of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1224-091X
Claire N HarrisonDepartment of Haematology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-920X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been a substantial increase in the diversity and number of therapeutic options for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). While many remain within the clinical trial arena, the clinician and patient community have seen more approvals reaching the clinic and a rethink on how best we should be approaching these disorders is required. In parallel, there needs to be a paradigm shift in end-point considerations within MPN clinical trial design, with a growing emphasis on longer term disease stability and modification, molecular responses, histomorphological modification, reductions in complications (e.g. thrombotic complications or disease transformation) and improved survival alongside the conventional goals such as haematological responses and symptom and spleen improvements where relevant. Given the heterogeneity of these disorders, with often marked intrapatient variability, greater consideration must be given to optimised sequencing strategies and rational combination approaches and, importantly, an emphasis on patient-specific trajectories. In this review, we appraise the contemporary therapeutic armamentarium across the MPN spectrum and explore how these advances may best facilitate increasing personalised approaches in an evolving and complex treatment landscape.

Indexed as

Myeloproliferative DisordersHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyJAK inhibitormyeloproliferative neoplasmnovel therapytransplantation

Identifiers

PMID42422927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.