ArticleTrends in hearing
Auditory Motion Perception by Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users With a Sound Coding Strategy that Synchronizes Peak-Picking Across the Ears.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users do not perform as well as typical hearing listeners when discriminating the direction of sound motion. This is likely due to the lack of synchronization between two independently operating sound processors. The use of bilaterally linked processors can improve the timing of electrical stimulation across the ears. However, these improvements are potentially counteracted by spectral peak-picking in sound coding strategies that may activate different electrodes across the ears, thereby reducing the fidelity of the binaural cues that BiCI users rely on for sound localization. To improve interaural synchrony, a bilateral peak-picking strategy that guarantees coordinated stimulation across the ears was developed and tested using the CCi-MOBILE, a bilaterally linked research processor. The auditory motion tracking abilities of nine BiCI users were measured using the bilateral peak-picking strategy and compared to performance with commercially available, unsynchronized processors. Results showed no effect of bilateral peak-picking. However, a small benefit was observed when tracking the range of motion of a sound when listening with bilateral synchronization which appears to be due to reduced interaural level difference changes with auditory motion. These findings suggest that dynamic auditory perception with BiCI may likely need bilaterally-synchronized hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.