ReviewExperimental dermatology2026
Reducing Unmet Needs in Hidradenitis Suppurativa by Including the Hair Follicle Among an Arsenal of Targets.
Review in Experimental dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a prevalent, debilitating disease affecting ~1% of the population, with limited therapeutic options and poor long-term remission rates. HS arises from inflammation and destruction of apocrine-bearing hair follicles, suggesting a multifactorial pathology involving immune dysregulation and follicular dysfunction. Emerging treatment strategies largely center on immune suppression, with three FDA-approved therapies targeting inflammatory pathways. However, most patients fail to achieve durable remission. Genetic evidence increasingly implicates the hair follicle as a key contributor to HS pathogenesis. For example, genes that cause ectodermal dysplasias (EDs) have been implicated by common risk variants identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and by rare variants in sequencing studies of rare ED syndromes that co-present with HS. EDs are Mendelian (i.e., single-gene) disorders that disrupt the development of ectodermal derivatives, including hair follicles and sweat glands. The enrichment of ED-associated genes in HS genetic studies, together with HS phenotypes observed in ED patients, supports a critical role for aberrant follicular development in HS pathogenesis. We propose that HS represents a spectrum of related diseases entities spanning immune dysregulation and hair follicle pathology, underscoring the need for biomarkers and refined disease classification to tailor treatment strategies. This perspective argues for broadening drug-development programs and insurance coverage for therapeutic strategies beyond immunomodulation to include follicle-targeted approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.