ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026
Cost to implement an outpatient stewardship intervention for acute otitis media (AOM).
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Most children 2 years and older with uncomplicated acute otitis media (AOM) are prescribed 10-day antibiotic durations, despite national guidelines recommending antibiotics for 5-7 days. Costs are often cited as a barrier to stewardship efforts. As part of a larger clinical trial including 2 systems and 46 clinics, we developed a low-intensity and a high-intensity intervention aimed at reducing antibiotic duration for AOM and evaluated implementation and sustainability for the interventions. Methods: Costs associated with each implementation activity were recorded over time, including material/supply costs (eg, printing) and personnel time costs. Sustainability costs were estimated based on ongoing implementation expenses. For each system, we assessed total intervention, activity-specific, and sustainability costs. Aggregate results were reported as the median across systems. Results: The total median implementation costs were $3,606 (range $2,540-$4,672) for the low-intensity intervention and $9,203 (range $7,557-$10,849) for the high-intensity intervention. For the low-intensity intervention, the primary cost driver was electronic health record modifications totaling $2,292 (range $1,615-$2,968). For the high-intensity intervention, the primary cost driver was audit and feedback system activation totaling $5,597 (range $2,885-$8,309). Personnel time accounted for over 90% of costs in both study arms. Sustainability costs were $133/year (range $77-$190) for the low-intensity intervention and $764/year (range $628-$901) for the high-intensity intervention. Conclusions: Overall costs were low. The high-intensity intervention resulted in higher costs compared to the low-intensity intervention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.