Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422836›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in medicine2026

A comparative study of conventional, High-flow, and jet ventilation via the Wei nasal jet tube for oxygen therapy in patients undergoing bronchoscopic intervention under deep sedation: a randomized controlled trial.

Ai-Di Zhang, Xiang Ge, Xiao-Li Li, Qing-Hao Cheng, Ming-Yuan Yang

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ai-Di ZhangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiang GeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Li LiDepartment of Respiratory, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qing-Hao Cheng *Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ming-Yuan Yang *Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypoxemia is a frequent complication in the bronchoscopic interventions (BI) under deep sedation due to shared airway challenges. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJ) enables supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation (SJOV) without tracheal intubation, but its efficacy and safety compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in patients with mild-to-moderate airway stenosis remain unclear. Methods: In the prospective randomized controlled trial, 150 patients through BI under deep sedation were allocated to three groups: COT (fractional inspired oxygen (FiO Results: A sum of 150 patients participated in the study. The incidences of hypoxemia, severe hypoxemia, and MPPO were compared among the three groups. The overall incidence of hypoxemia differed significantly ( Conclusion: SJOV delivered via the Wei nasal jet tube improved intraoperative oxygenation and reduced hypoxemia compared with COT during bronchoscopic intervention under deep sedation, without increasing adverse events. These findings support SJOV as a feasible oxygenation and ventilation strategy for selected patients with mild-to-moderate airway stenosis. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.html, identifier ChiCTR2100054123.

Indexed as

bronchoscopic interventionconventional oxygen therapyhigh-flow nasal cannulasupraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilationWei nasal jet tube

Identifiers

PMID42422836
PMCPMC13341611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.