SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy of Kuntai capsules with low-dose Femoston for perimenopausal syndrome: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Kuntai capsule (KTC) has been widely used to treat perimenopausal syndrome (PMS). However, evidence on its combination with low-dose Femoston (FMT) remains insufficient. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of KTC plus low-dose FMT versus low-dose FMT alone in the treatment of PMS. Methods: Eight databases were searched from inception to October 30, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KTC combined with low-dose FMT versus low-dose FMT alone in the treatment of PMS. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed bias risk with the RoB 1.0 tool. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0. The robustness of the results was evaluated by trial sequential analysis (TSA), and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results: Ten RCTs comprising 1,057 participants were included. Compared with low-dose FMT alone, adjunctive KTC significantly improved the clinical response rate [ Conclusion: Based on current evidence, KTC combined with low-dose FMT may have potential advantages in improving PMS-related symptoms, sex hormone levels, and lipid profiles, with an acceptable short-term safety profile in patients. However, the certainty of evidence across the outcome measures, as assessed by GRADE, was not high. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further verification through high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled trials is warranted. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2025-11-0002/, identifier INPLASY2025110002.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.