ArticleNational journal of maxillofacial surgery
Efficacy of superiorly based nasolabial flap in post-mucor infrastructure maxillectomy defects.
Article in National journal of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of the Study: Reconstruction of post-mucor oral cavity defects (ranging from simple alveolectomy defects to complete maxillectomy defects) will improve the function, esthetics, and general health of an individual. Various surgical and prosthetic options are available for the successful reconstruction of the defects. The nasolabial flap has versatile role in the reconstruction of oral cavity defects because of its proximity to the defect area, optimal esthetic results, and less surgical morbidity unlike distant flaps. In this study, we assessed the efficiency of the nasolabial flap in reconstruction of post-mucor infrastructure maxillectomy defects in 42 individuals by comparing the pre-surgical and post-surgical abilities to speak and swallow. Patients and Methods: Patients with post-mucor infrastructure maxillectomy defects were involved in this prospective study. Fifty-one patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected. All the study parameters (swallowing ability, hypernasality, speech intelligibility, and subjective satisfaction of an individual) were assessed preoperatively. Reconstruction of the defect was done with a superiorly based nasolabial flap. Nine patients were lost to follow up, and 42 patients were followed up for six months to evaluate the study parameters. Results: Pre-surgical and post-surgical statistical data analysis shows that there is a significant improvement in the functional outcomes of an individual. 76% of the patients showed no signs of nasal regurgitation, dribbling of saliva, or coughing upon swallowing after reconstruction of the defect with nasolabial flap. Significant improvement in speech after the closure of maxillary defect was observed as 93% of patients had socially acceptable speech and 64.5% had normal intelligible speech postoperatively. Upon subjective satisfaction assessment, 64% of the patients were satisfied with the treatment procedure. Conclusion: Closure of oro-antral communication and creation of a seal between oral and nasal cavities using the nasolabial flap leads to improvement in the function of an individual in terms of speech intelligibility and swallowing ability. The nasolabial flap can be considered as an optimal option for managing post-mucor infrastructure maxillectomy defects by restoring functional and psychosocial well-being of a person.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.