Observational studyResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Self-testing and clinical outcomes in Black and White patients on warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.
Observational study in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Warfarin management requires frequent international normalized ratio (INR) testing. Self-testing may reduce this burden and improve INR control and outcomes. However, concerns exist about variability in utilization and the effectiveness of self-testing across different patient groups. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate INR self-testing utilization and clinical outcomes in Black and White warfarin-treated patients. Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, Black and White patients who were using warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism (April 2012 to July 2024) were identified from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative registry. INR control and outcomes were compared between self-testers and non-self-testers. Rates were adjusted by inverse probability weighting; comparisons between racial groups used the negative binomial model. Major and nonmajor bleeding events were defined based on the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Moderation analysis examined whether race influences self-testing's safety and effectiveness. Results: Among 5903 warfarin-treated patients (20.5% Black, 79.5% White), self-testing was used by fewer than 1 in 7 patients (15.3% White, 10.1% Black). Self-testers had higher adjusted time in therapeutic range (TTR; 65.3% vs 59.8%; Conclusion: Self-testing was utilized infrequently, especially among Black patients, but was associated with better INR control and less bleeding than traditional INR testing. Increased utilization and support of self-testing may improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.