Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422772›Full record

Observational studyResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026

Self-testing and clinical outcomes in Black and White patients on warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.

Brindha Rajakumar, Xiaowen Kong, Brian Haymart, Scott Kaatz, Gregory Krol, Mona Ali, Noelle Ryan, Stacy Ellsworth, Beverly Stallings, Tina Alexandris-Souphis and 4 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Brindha RajakumarDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Xiaowen KongDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Brian HaymartDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Scott KaatzDivision of Hospital Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Gregory KrolDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Mona AliDepartment of Heart and Vascular Services, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.
Noelle RyanDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Stacy EllsworthDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Beverly StallingsDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Tina Alexandris-SouphisDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Amy DeLellisDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Josh ErricksonMichigan Program on Value Enhancement, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
James B FroehlichDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Geoffrey D BarnesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Warfarin management requires frequent international normalized ratio (INR) testing. Self-testing may reduce this burden and improve INR control and outcomes. However, concerns exist about variability in utilization and the effectiveness of self-testing across different patient groups. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate INR self-testing utilization and clinical outcomes in Black and White warfarin-treated patients. Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, Black and White patients who were using warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism (April 2012 to July 2024) were identified from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative registry. INR control and outcomes were compared between self-testers and non-self-testers. Rates were adjusted by inverse probability weighting; comparisons between racial groups used the negative binomial model. Major and nonmajor bleeding events were defined based on the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Moderation analysis examined whether race influences self-testing's safety and effectiveness. Results: Among 5903 warfarin-treated patients (20.5% Black, 79.5% White), self-testing was used by fewer than 1 in 7 patients (15.3% White, 10.1% Black). Self-testers had higher adjusted time in therapeutic range (TTR; 65.3% vs 59.8%; Conclusion: Self-testing was utilized infrequently, especially among Black patients, but was associated with better INR control and less bleeding than traditional INR testing. Increased utilization and support of self-testing may improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationBlack or African AmericanDrug MonitoringSelf CareVenous ThromboembolismWarfarinWhiteAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHemorrhageHumansInternational Normalized RatioMaleMichiganAnticoagulantsWarfarinatrial fibrillationbleedinginternational normalized ratiovenous thromboembolismwarfarin

Identifiers

PMID42422772
PMCPMC13343142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.