Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422756›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2026

The Transformative Journey of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Ayaka Sonehara, Tetsuya Tajima, Carlos O Esquivel, Olivia M Martinez, Sheri M Krams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayaka SoneharaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Tetsuya TajimaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Carlos O EsquivelDepartment of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Olivia M MartinezDepartment of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Sheri M KramsDepartment of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6049-5119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has emerged as a groundbreaking technique in reconstructive surgery, offering remarkable restoration of both function and aesthetics after severe tissue loss. However, despite its transformative clinical potential, widespread adoption remains limited because of the risk of rejection, the need for lifelong systemic immunosuppression and its associated risks, and donor-specific constraints unique to VCA, including morphological matching requirements and ethical and psychosocial considerations surrounding composite tissue donation. This review synthesizes findings from both basic research and clinical studies on VCA. We analyzed experimental studies using rodent and large-animal models and reviewed clinical outcomes in uterus, face, upper extremity, and abdominal wall transplants. In rodent models, costimulation blockade and interleukin-2/anti-interleukin-2 complexes significantly prolonged graft survival. Local therapies, such as tacrolimus-containing hydrogels and regulatory T cell-inducing microparticles, demonstrated the ability to extend graft survival beyond 200 d while reducing systemic immunosuppression. Clinically, uterus and face transplants have shown improved graft survival and functional outcomes, with reported live birth rates of 35%-40% in uterus transplantation and 5-y graft survival rates of 85% in face transplantation. Upper extremity transplantation resulted in the restoration of protective sensation in nearly all recipients. This study provides a comprehensive review of VCA, encompassing the foundational basic research underpinning its progress, and the clinical outcomes and challenges associated with the procedure. By examining these aspects, we aim to elucidate the current state of VCA, identify persistent challenges, and explore future directions for advancing its clinical application and optimizing patient outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID42422756
PMCPMC13345028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.