Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422755›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2026

Do we Treat the Right Patients? Predictors of Psychosocial Treatment Frequencies in a Multimodal Aftercare Program: A KTx360° Substudy.

Charlotte Kuczyk, Martina de Zwaan, Felix Klewitz, Maximilian Bauer-Hohmann, Aline Debener, Yesim Erim, Lena Schiffer, Sven Haufe, Uwe Tegtbur, Lars Pape and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charlotte KuczykDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5978-1029
Martina de ZwaanDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Felix KlewitzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Maximilian Bauer-HohmannDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Aline DebenerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Yesim ErimDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Lena SchifferDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Sven HaufeDepartment of Sports Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Uwe TegtburDepartment of Sports Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lars PapeDepartment of Pediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Mario SchifferDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Mariel NöhreDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial interventions are essential in multimodal aftercare for kidney transplant recipients. However, it remains unclear whether they effectively reach patients with low adherence or elevated mental distress. Methods: We investigated (1) the frequency of suboptimal adherence and mental distress at any point during the aftercare program Kidney Transplantation 360° study (KTx360°), a multicenter, multisectoral, multimodal, telemedicine-based follow-up care model; (2) the rate of psychosocial intervention utilization, and (3) the association between these factors, along with demographic and clinical characteristics, and intervention uptake. This analysis draws on a sample of n = 838 participants. Participants with and without utilization of psychosocial interventions were compared using chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney Results: Suboptimal adherence and mental distress were frequently observed in our cohort, affecting 60.6% (n = 508) of participants at some point during the study. Utilization remained limited, with only 27.6% (n = 140) of affected individuals engaging with them. Still, higher levels of suboptimal adherence (ß = 0.48; Conclusions: Even though suboptimal adherence and increased mental distress were associated with a higher utilization of psychosocial intervention, the majority of affected patients were not reached, highlighting a significant gap between need and access. Understanding patterns of utilization is crucial when designing scalable and feasible psychosocial interventions for transplant recipients.

Identifiers

PMID42422755
PMCPMC13344920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.